On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:48:03 +1000
Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:19, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > I think we should think carefully about the dependence on this package
> > for 1.5.0. There will be people who are used to LyX working on their
> > system who try out the 1.4 or 1.5 series and can't work this out on
> > their own.
> 
> > Of course the 1.3 series seemed to work fine without it and it had
> > similar functionality, is it possibly better to handle this in LyX
> > instead?
> 
> OK now I'm *even* *more* *confused*.
> 
> The system I just compiled LyX on, which ran 1.3.x fine, doesn't have a
> file called "prettyref.sty" (that I could find). It does have
> "hyperref.sty" if that might be related.

No it is not... that's for producing hyperlinks to all kinds of
references (like figure and section numbers; not just citations)

> Yet it works fine with the latest svn. Could somebody please explain
> what is going on?

Hmmm... didn't we re-do this stuff to work around the lack of
prettyref? Who remembers?

> Have fun,
> Darren

- Martin

Reply via email to