Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have
Dov> to add it in 4 or 5 new places.
Very good argument. Thanks for checking.
Dov> Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in for a while (since r10513,
Dov> 10/2005), I don't know why it's only now that we're questioning
Dov> whether this really belongs here or not;
Because it is only now that we have RtL-knowledgeable people looking
at this code. Martin at the time did the best he could to fix problems
reported by users (I think). Butthe RtL code in LyX has been rotting
for a long time.
JMarc
So where does this leave us with regard to the proposed patch...?
So, can this patch go in? Again, to recap: the concept is IMO correct;
it works; we don't love the way that we do it, but haven't gotten any
better suggestions...
