>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Lars> | I prefer "No document open!" >> Lars> Sounds strange. Is that even english? >> Lars> I thought that 'No' usually required plural (unless you want to Lars> give it a different meaning.) >> I do not know... So where are the native English speakers? >> Richard> "No document open" is fine. E.g., "No player scored more than Richard> one goal". The plural is ok there, too. What is best? We have "No documents open!" now, the principle of least effort would advise to keep it like that... JMarc
