On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:37:31AM +0200, Mael Hilléreau wrote: > Le 6 juin 07 à 00:23, Andre Poenitz a écrit : > > >>It would make sense to compute checksum only if the timestamp is > >>different: it then saves the conversion process in the case no new > >>modifications exist (i.e. the file was saved but not modified). > > > >That assumes that changed files cannot have the same time stamp. > >Even if that might hold true in most cases > >POSIX guarantees only 1 sec resolution, FAT has 2 IIRC. > > > >One can have tons of changes in that time.... > > ??? > I think you're incredibly productive if you can modify AND save a > graphic file more than one time per second!
We are talking about automated conversion, aren't we? !! But if we suppose that, > then you won't care to wait the next second for a screen update to > come up ;) Is it only screen update, or is it also correctness of conversion? Andre'
