On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:39:32AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:28:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:48:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:37:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > >>>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > Bo> I can not imagine anything else you might want to experiment in > > > > Bo> 1.6.0. > > > > > > > > Get rid of the corners and use background instead in order to avoid > > > > those extra blank pixels? > > > > > > What when insets are nested? Are you proposing to use a different > > > colour for each nested inset? Nah... > > > > I think it might be sufficient do color the innermost inset still > > containing the cursor. > > As I already said, what is the difference with respect to simply > showing the corners without reserving space for them?
The corners would not overwrite inset contents. > > Nevertheless we'd lose visual information this way, as right now > > we also see the nesting leading to the cursor position which _I_ > > find rather helpful (otherwise there weren't these cure l'll corners > > anyway...) > > You can get that info by looking at the status line. Too far away. Andre'
