Re: Patch: better multi-lingual support

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Well, I'm not against to have a unicode based multilingual document
| support.  I would just like to have a mode for single language
| documents in local encodings, just as single byte language users
| have at present.

I belive that we should use the same identical internal encoding
always, this makes things a log easier...

| I perfectly understand we do not want to use variable length multibyte
| characters as the internal representation.  But any multibyte encodings
| have their fixed width wide charcater representation counterpart.  So
| for a single language document, unicode *encoding* might not be
| obligatory.

I think it should be.

        Lgb