Richard Heck wrote: > OK, thanks. I'd certainly have overlooked that, at least initially. I > think it is possible to get the mailer to do the work, though. This > involves getting some consistency between dialog names and inset names, > which isn't exactly wonderful, but I think it will be OK, at least > initially.
IMHO such a consistency is rather desirable. There is no need for two namespaces here, and if you have only one you cannot use the dialog name by accident where the inset name is needed. > We'll see. Yes. Georg
