Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The truth is, if this information is available, then I would just > incorporate it into the precedence tables I suggest: so you'd have > dynamic precedence tables, which are ordered first by range extent, > and only when that's not enough (same range / overlapping ranges), > also by a static precedence table.
Except that the precedence table would be different in different par of the paragraph. So in effect, you need complete ranges. JMarc
