Bo Peng wrote:
This discussion would also involve the words "session-based alternative".

And I should have added: I thought we had agreed that we will not implement
any form of reversibility. It's what leads to the really bad security
problems.

Technically speaking, we are aiming at different goals. I have stated
my design goal several times so I will not repeat here. I used
bundle/unbundle to achieve that goal but failed, so I am using a
different approach. This approach does not have to solve the
bundle/unbundle  problem that you have, it does not have a bundled
mode so there is no reversibility to talk about. In that sense, the
reversibility problem is yours, not mine.

I'm perplexed about this, since I don't have any such problem.

However, my approach can be used to bundle/unbundle external files,
and I do try to achieve full reversibility. This is why I am trying to
keep file links in .lyx file (optional or encrypted). I have stated
reasons why I dislike the session idea.

Would you mind stating them again? I can't for the life of me see the problem.

Richard


Reply via email to