On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:24:03PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > rgheck wrote: >>> 4. The switching between bundle and unbundled mode is non-reversible. >>> For example, when ../figures/figure.png is copied to >>> filename.lyxdir/figures/figure.png during bundling, it is not copied >>> back during unbundling. That is to say, if you work in unbundled mode >>> locally, send your document in bundled mode to your co-author, you can >>> not get your external files back when the document is sent back. In >>> another word, you have to use bundled mode if you intent to share your >>> file with others. >>> >>> >> This discussion would also involve the words "session-based alternative". >> > And I should have added: I thought we had agreed that we will not implement > any form of reversibility. It's what leads to the really bad security > problems. So if Bo's latest implementation permits reversibility, then it > has the same sorts of security problems the old one did. It might be a > little harder to exploit them, I don't know, but they will still be there > waiting for someone with enough malicious imagination to cause problems.
Does it? >From my point of view all the problems _I_ envisioned seemed to be solved with the anonymization/encryption approach. Andre'
