> Question 1: do you use the lyx2lyx framework? The advantage would be that > lyx2lyx knows about the lyx format of all revisions.
Nope, and it is a very good idea. However I would like to build a standalone tool that does not require other libraries to work, i.e. to minimize dependencies -- not because users will not have lyx2lyx installed but because of runtime problems. > Question 2: Maybe a feature option would be to use MathML, did you think > about this? Again, no. But this one fits very well with my tool design. Seeing that MathML is supported in e.g. Firefox it is an interesting addition for the future. > I think this would be a great addition to LyX because the different latex to > html tools are often quite difficult to get right, if at all. Thanks for the encouragement! Alex.
