On 2009-04-23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> writes:
>>> My goal is to implement the new tag OutputFormat in layout files, that >>> would complement OutputType. However I'd like to do it right. ... > What I have in mind is to allow any string in OutputFormat. If the > corresponding format is not known to LyX, then no export is possible. Yes, this is what I had in mind. >>> And there is of course the "XeTeX" case, which is yet another latex >>> variation. I tend to think that if should be considered as equivalent >>> to pdflatex, but things are not as simple. >> Actually, even the foo->latex step might be bypassed if there is an >> alternative converter-chain to the end format. > Agreed. >> Then, e.g. "literate" (or "noweb", "cweb", "nuweb", "sweave", ....) can >> remain an OutputType as long as you define a literate -> docbook >> converter. > These would not be OutputTypes, but OutputFormats. Sorry, I choose the first (and wrong) auto-completion. (What is an OutputTye, by the way?) Thanks, Günter
