Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: >>> On a related note, it would be good to have a Debug::FIND code for >>> debugging the search/replace feature, but those codes seem already to be >>> saturating the 32-bits. >> there is still one left, so its ok to use it for search. >> > Then, I would be happy to grab that one (see attached patch).
its in > However, turning the Debug::Type enum to a 'uint_64_t' yes >and all of the enum > elements to simple constants wouldn't seem to me as a bad idea, you will lose the trick with binary mask when more debug levels are chosen. pavel
