* Pavel Sanda wrote, On 15/09/09 12:56:
Sam Liddicott wrote:
as an example:
If Richard requires changes that Alex will not meet, then Lyx will suffer, not Alex and not Richard.

i am sorry but i completely disagree. Richard is trying to keep the code
maintanable and clean. this value may become clear only when you try to
fix bugs of others people, not ujust hack something for this moment.

I cast no aspersions on Richard, it may also be that Lyx will suffer if Richard relaxes his standards.

I was trying to state that exclusion of eLyXer does not hurt either of them personally; Richard because it may not meet his standards, and Alex because he personally already has the benefits of eLyXer.

Sam

Reply via email to