On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
>
> We should make a way to ensure that LyXFunc are called with the
> correct number of arguments and also that the arguments are of the
> correct type. I think I have a nice solution for this...first we
> change the LyXFunc::dispatch to a different type of arg...
>
I was trying to read the core code this weekend, and I got confused
between the the two classes LyXFunc/LyXAction. What is their relation ?
They seem very similar ...
What are the plans for the lyxfunc redesign ? Can we encapsulate every
function into a certain set of parameters, e.g.
enum: LFUN_RANDOM,
command: "buffer-random",
staticstate: NeedBuffer etc.,
dynamicstate: Disabled etc.,
description: "Generates random number",
KB mapping: etc.
<however the C++ gurus represent the function prototype>
Out of interest can people comment on the big picture you are planning on
here ?
thanks
john
--
"In fact by my calculations it took 1296 hours to pass one mile... coming in
at a fantastic 0.000772 miles per hour."
- grahamsz on Mozilla
