Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Better is to switch to tr1, and as fallback to use an external boost >> tr1 implementation. > > The part that is problematic for stdlib-debug, I think, is boost::regex. > Does tr1 contain something like that?
Yes, but it is not 100% source compatible (at least with msvc). > > We could also: > > - have external-boost be the default for releases > - have internal-boost be the default for devel versions (or at lease > make sure it is compilable). > > I speak for autotools of course, but I think we should make the same > choices for the different architectures. > > How is boost used for windows BTW? For releases I assume internal, because there is no system-boost. > > JMarc >
