On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:10:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > "Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW" <v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> writes: > > So, why are we discussing it then .. Because we need it ? > > > > Isn't the use of cur.dispatched(), cur.undispatched(), > > cur.result().dispatched() basically a work-around for missing the > > DispatchResult which only works in places where there is a Cursor > > available ? > > > > If so, then it has been needed already in a lot of places. > > I would not be opposed to systematic use of DispatchResult in > FuncRequest. > > The part with Cursor is Andre's doing, but I do not rememeber what the > reasoning was at the time.
I've been trying to remember since I saw the first message in this thread but can't either. It probably... "grew". Pretty much like the BufferView access through the Cursor ;-} Andre'
