>>>>> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Baruch> While trying to figure out the reason for the crashing bug on
Baruch> undo, I've traced it out in the mathed domain. Trying to fix
Baruch> various bits that seemed just plain wrong I encountered quite
Baruch> a bit of problems and possible bugs around it.
Yes, it is painful to follow/fix.
Baruch> I seem to remember that there was a talk about someone redoing
Baruch> the whole mathed part, so is it worth it tracing these bugs
Baruch> and trying to fix them, a thing that might introduce other
Baruch> bugs in the process, either by unconvering inactive ones or
Baruch> creating new ones in the process. Or should I just drop it and
Baruch> leave these bugs as they are waiting for the new replacement
Baruch> to be brought forward?
Alejandro (the original author of mathed) has a rewritten version but
he never found the time to adapt it to the new code, it seems. Thaty's
really a pity.
Baruch> If the answer is to go forward with fixing those bugs, then
Baruch> the other question is whether I should bother doing it for
Baruch> 1.1.6 or wait for a later release to introduce such fixes.
The answer is "I don't know" :(
JMarc
