On 2010-02-12, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Currently, a unicode glyph (outside the output file's encoding) either > in the label or in the key yields a silent iconv error ... > The attached patch against branch solves both issues.
> Objections, comments? Thanks. However, the "silence" of the iconv error > (the document is > not output, but the user gets no warning either). should be adressed in a generic way as well (not only iconv but any helper application) (as this can happen also with unknown glyphs). Günter
