Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> writes: > Abdelrazak Younes <you...@lyx.org> writes: >> It depends on the MAC packager really. I personally prefer to avoid >> indirection and our spellchecker API is just enough for our use. Using >> Enchant means that the MAC package will have to take care of glib >> integration in the build system. > > Agreed. The question is whether we have a mac coder able to read the > support from enchant and make a back-end for our own use from there.
In the mean-time I have contacted enchant author, who does not know much about this applespell business. Next step is to contact the applespell plugin author. I'll keep you informaed. But of course, turning the enchant applespell backend into a proper LyX spell backend would be best. JMarc
