> It sound like a good idea. I don't think keytest is getting much > benefit from version control as it is. With commit access I could > submit 100 atomic changes without flooding lyx-devel with messages > about a tool that currently I think only I use. >
Uhhm.. but then you're flooding the lyx-cvslog list. > Also I Should add the recipes for reproducing bugs that keytest > generates to SVN, so that I could do a regression test type of thing. > The most natural way of doing this would be to add one file per bug, > but I could also use a single file approach and append new bugs to the > end. Would this latter approach be preferred so as to limit the number > of files that everyone has to check out? Uhhm.. I'm not sure whether I'll like that all the output is added to svn too. What do others think? Vincent
