Am Montag 12 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: ... > Yes, but when using the command line typing 0 or 1 is simpler.
Not nice, but ok ...
> > And why do we need e.g. LYX_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE? This looks as if python
> > (or perl) would belong to lyx. (For found libraries we don't have this
> > too)
> >
> > Kornel
>
> The idea was to cleanup the variable list in cmake-gui.
But this two are not yet found in the gui ...
Instead there are:
GETTEXT_*_EXECUTABLE (MSGFMT, MSGMERGE, MSGUNIQ,XGETTEXT)
_PYTHON_EXECUTABE
PYTHON_EXECUTABLE
_PERL_EXECUTABLE
QT_*_EXECUTABLE (MOC, QMAKE, RCC, UIC3, UIC)
> Found libraries always have their own scope and _ is
> not a scope. We set this two variables in our scripts
> so wy not prefix them with LYX_?
>
> Peter
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
