Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> >> Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Stephan Witt wrote: >>>> Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare >>>> the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. >>> >>> this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century Schoolbook L font. >>> (patched version) >> >> Do you refer to the different vertical line positions? > > i refer to the the red line jumping like a goat on the hills. this is > intended?
Yes. Do you have another idea? The problem is as follows: When drawing the misspelled marker you don't know in advance if a change follows later in line and vice versa. If you paint both lines with constant different vertical offset it looks weird when only one of them is present. A possible solution could be the painting of change tracking markers below a possible spell check marker. So, documents without change tracking will be presented normal. A document without spelling mistakes and change tracking enabled would suffer then. The optimal solution would be a two pass algorithm for the computation of the offsets... > if you look closely you can see strange drawing artifacts as well (thin full > red lines)... Yes, I can see them now. I'll try it on Linux then... Stephan
