Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:42:03AM +0100, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: > > > > the movement shouldn't be as big as in normal traffic - but right - thats > > > possible... and its what we want - to focus on bugs and not on new > > > features. > > > > It's right. I'll take a look at the ticket list if I can help in something. > > Another thing: why 2.1? It's a change so big that wouldn't fit in 2.0.1? > > I think Pavel meant 2.0.1, as it doesn't entail a file format change, > I think. You know, even the most apparently innocent change right before > a release could introduce regressions.
it depends how much intrusive the patch will be. and i'm not the branch maintainer to decide it either ;) pavel
