Le 06/12/2010 14:01, RGH a écrit :
So the existing situation is very close to this, except inverted: If we notice that the cache needs updating, then we run a special routine to update the cache (not a full buffer update), and then run the buffer update. So if we go this way, then we have no speed gain (which was the original hope). There's also no great simplification in the code, so far as I can see.
I think we can run the full updateLabel thing (remember it is going to be very rare), since it is _much_ faster than the iterator-based solution.
JMarc
