Le 26/01/2011 17:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
No, I already tried to audit that. The only possibility of missing
a newline would be when outputing "\nblabla", i.e., when the '\n'
is the first char of a string. So, checking is quite strightforward.
thanks for looking into this. if no other comments appear
this looks ok to go in.
I would have preferred a more explicit syntax like
os << breakl << "\\begin"
and have all explicit \n be output.
But I do not know how difficult it is to handle.
And also this is a problem with texrow.
Also, what happens with the << operators that you have not yet overridden?
JMarc
