Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote: > For c), it's a > complete rewrite, so I'm not considering it for now :-).
but this is the only way to go no? c is also more likely to happen without a and b, so maybe we should allow only real fixes and not ad-hoc workarounds (enrico would call it bloat i suspect) for something that should be fixed at the root...
