Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012 um 23:30:08, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta <[email protected]> > On 13/12/12 12:33, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Checking findadv-08-in.txt (Shouldn't we better create 3 logs here?) > > That's possible/useful, sure. Feel free to apply modifications.
Did it locally now.
> This is one of a few test cases where I had to increase the typing delay (KD:
> 200).
> I just verified that commenting out that line the test fails, as it doesn't
> seem to
> manage to check the needed option properly. As a rough guess, it seems like
> the GUI
> manages to execute the [Enter] action before finishing the Alt+l, Alt+r
> actions
> that are dispatched before -- increasing the waiting time there, fixed the
> issue.
> Though, there are a few cases in which this problem returns, and depending on
> the
> hardware and/or WM options, some of these tests may unnecessarily fail.
> Sometimes, repeating the failing test leads to passing it, but I understand
> it's
> not optimum.
It does not help here. There is something fishy ... let me explain.
The second part of findadv-08 test searches for 'Putting.*par 1' but here the
string is 'Putting.*par 2'
If I change it to search for 'Putting.*par 2', the string is 'Putting.*par 1'
If I change to search for 'Putting.*par [12]', the string is 'Putting.*par 3'
it works ONLY, if I set the search string to 'Putting.*par [123]'. The string
in log-file is from this moment
always 'par 3'.
Something I don't understand is, why in the log appears 'Starting LyX . . .' 9
times, (should it not be 3 times?)
Env{MAX_LOOP} is set to 1 after all.
Ooooh shit, it should be 'MAX_LOOPS'
Now it works! And the test is faster! Phew!
> As u said, till it's just me, but if there's at least someone else, and it
> becomes
> integrated in a standard testing process, then I'd like to fix these issues.
>
> Can u pls try the attached test out ?
>
> > P.S.
> >
> > Sorry if the private mail is not what you prefer here, but as we are ATM
> > the only persons
>
> Yes, perhaps someone else gets curious and volunteers to help writing a
> couple of further tests.
Testing may not be so exciting for everyone, I know.
> T.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
