Liviu is correct. And in knitr, I really do not want to support `<<>>= xx` either, although for now, xx is ignored.
Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie <xieyi...@gmail.com> Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa State University 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: >> 03/06/2013 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> >>> - tex2lyx part for the new chunk inset, >> >> >> This is in now. Please test with your favorite files! >> >> One thing that is not clear to me is the usefulness of supporting cases like >> >> <<aaa>= xx >> code here >> @ yyy >> >> where if I understand correctly "xx" and "yy" are ignored. Liviu, Yihui, >> could you comment (in the case of sweave, knitr)? Are they correct? Useful? >> > I don't think they're useful, nor valid Sweave/knitr code. Sweave > simply ignores the "xx" and "yy". While, knitr ignores "xx" but chokes > on "yy". > > Regards, > Liviu
