On Monday 27 January 2014 13:09:45 Richard Heck wrote: > I had assumed the original reporter was running into a problem with this > particular script and had brought it to our attention for thar reason. > But perhaps not? > > Richard
The script in question has the executable bit set, so the script could use the shebang. On the other hand, using my Fedora hat we install all scripts with mask 644 and we never had any report of problems because as I said before lyx always prefixes the call with the python path. That is why, for me, this a stylistic patch and this issue does not deserve the time we are using to discuss it. :-) -- José Abílio
