On Monday 22 January 2001 11:05, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I've already made changes that prevent inserting empty labels,
> as this was the behaviour in 1.1.5. Why do we need empty
> references ?
Or empty Citations, or empty anything else for that matter. Perhaps we should
use the philosopy "give him enough rope to hang himself with". In other
words, if the user really wants an empty inset (for whatever, unknown,
personal reason) then let him have it. The sane, intelligent user would of
course just press Cancel.
I'm not saying that I agree with this policy, (in fact, let me say that I
don't) but we had this self-same chat a long, long time ago and the consensus
view was "Ok" inserts the inset whether it's full or not.
Angus
