Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 um 10:49:55, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski <[email protected]> > Hi, > > Again - on OS X 10.7, this will not work. And I don’t think the scripts used > in LyX are that complex that we cannot handle them with using the future > statement; for the two first scripts I converted, the work was trivial and > did not require it.
At least prints could be rewritten with
import sys
...
sys.out.write(...)
or
output = open(...)
output.write(....)
No dependencies on python2 or python3.
Just my 2 cents.
> We can maybe start by not using it and discussing when/if needed.
>
> Benjamin
>
> On 6 May 2014 at 22:09:59 , Neal Becker ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> José Matos wrote:
>
> > On Friday 02 May 2014 13:31:36 Neal Becker wrote:
> >> I think the python-future package is helpful
> >
> > Do you mean
> >
> > from __future__ import print_function, division
> >
> > if so I agree. :-)
> >
>
> No, I mean:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/future
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
