Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > But why not get rid of TR1 stuff unconditionnally? We already support > compilers that do not have it (and fall back to boost), right?
Yes. I did not think that far yesterday;-) Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > But why not get rid of TR1 stuff unconditionnally? We already support > compilers that do not have it (and fall back to boost), right?
Yes. I did not think that far yesterday;-) Georg