Am 27.12.2014 um 15:37 schrieb Georg Baum <[email protected]>:

> Stephan Witt wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lyxers,
>> 
>> this is Mac OS X 10.6.8 with
>> $ g++ -v
>> Using built-in specs.
>> Target: i686-apple-darwin11
>> Configured with:
>> /private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~28/src/configure
>> --disable-checking --enable-werror
>> --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2
>> --mandir=/share/man --enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++
>> --program-prefix=llvm- --program-transform-name=/^[cg][^.-]*$/s/$/-4.2/
>> --with-slibdir=/usr/lib --build=i686-apple-darwin11
>> --enable-llvm=/private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.11~28/dst-
> llvmCore/Developer/usr/local
>> --program-prefix=i686-apple-darwin11- --host=x86_64-apple-darwin11
>> --target=i686-apple-darwin11 --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
>> Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658)
>> (LLVM build 2336.11.00)
>> 
>> ...
>>  CXX      trivstring.o
>> In file included from
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/trivstring.cpp:13:
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/../support/trivstring.h:66: error:
>> expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘>’ token
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/../support/trivstring.h:65: error:
>> wrong number of template arguments (1, should be 3)
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/../support/strfwd.h:46: error: provided
>> for ‘template<class Char, class Traits, class Alloc> struct
>> std::basic_string’
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/../support/trivstring.h:66: error:
>> default argument missing for parameter 3 of ‘lyx::trivial_string<Char>
>> lyx::trivial_string<Char>::substr(size_t, size_t, std::char_traits<Char>,
>> std::allocator<Char>) const’
>> /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/support/../support/trivstring.h:66: error:
>> default argument missing for parameter 4 of ‘lyx::trivial_string<Char>
>> lyx::trivial_string<Char>::substr(size_t, size_t, std::char_traits<Char>,
>> std::allocator<Char>) const’
> 
> This looks very strange. It works here on linux both with g++ 4.7 and 
> clang++ 3.5, and I do not see anything wrong from manual inspection. Does it 
> work if you combine line 65 and 66 into a single line? Maybe the parser does 
> not like the line break inside the type definition?
> 

Is it possible that this compiler - based on gcc 4.2.1 - simply does not
support these template constructs? I tried to verify this with the help
of google - but I didn't find much useful infos. Perhaps, the best match is
http://mlucassmith.tumblr.com/post/8052052794/c-11-on-osx-is-a-mess

Stephan

Reply via email to