Liviu Andronic wrote: > I propose that whenever someone finds some item particularly yummy, > and they start looking more closely into the issue, that they > nominally assign themselves to that item so that others would know > that someone is already working on it. (OK, that was unnecessarily > verbose, even if surprisingly precise, but I hope it's excusable given > that it's quite late here...)
I had a look, and most reports make sense. Also the wording is excellent. There are however also some in qt headers, and several cases of dead code which is #ifdefd out on purpose. My main problem was that the intersting issues were in code I do not understand enough, so I did not dare to touch it;-( Georg
