On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 06:34:26AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:24:55PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:40:34PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > > >> Thanks, Guenter. This really puts things into perspective for me. > >> I updated #8035 with your clear explanation. > > > Should we mark these tests as unreliable, with a comment pointing to > > #8035? > > This would not harm, but as the tests work (again) for both of you, you > could also just leave it.
The tests do not work for me. I see that Kornel reports that .*/ru/Intro_pdf4_systemF now passes, but that test was never one of the 11 that failed for me. The failing tests I reported still fail for me. Do any of the tests I reported in the original email pass for you Kornel? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature