On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 07:27, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : > >Suppose a module defines flex insets moo and baa (the locale-dependent > >version of foo and bah in New Zealand), and these are used in a document > >to which the module has been added. If the module is now deleted from > >the document, the flex insets become undefined. If the document is saved > >then closed with undefined insets, the saved file will contain lines like > > > >\begin_inset Flex undefined > > Please open a new ticket.
Yes and mark it with milestone 2.2.0. I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it with 2.2.0dev. I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not going to an RC with a known dataloss bug that is a regression. Although the bug only shows in a specific case and has gone unnoticed for more than a year in 2.2.0dev, it is pretty easy to trigger and it would not be surprising at all that a user comes across it. I would like to hear from Jürgen to see if a quick fix can be made before proceeding with rc1. > I think it is a consequence of > > commit cfeddb9293bb1e3b45fe2f118a6ce35e37bbebf3 > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller <[email protected]> > Date: Mon Dec 8 09:06:41 2014 +0100 > > Add ObsoletedBy tag to InsetLayout > > Fixes: #9000. Jürgen are you able to take a look? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
