On 04/16/2016 01:45 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/04/16 19:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:34:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> >>> As usual, fixes for bugs committed to 2.2.1-staging (=2.2.x) should >>> first be >>> committed to 2.3-staging (=master). These should be marked >>> "fixedinmaster" >>> in trac but NOT "fixedinstable" and tagged with milestone 2.2.1. >> >> So now "fixedinmaster" does not necessarily mean "fixed in the next >> major release" (2.2.0). This is confusing I think. But on the other hand >> creating another category (e.g. fixedinstaging) would also be confusing. > > I am not sure what the point of 2.2.1-staging is. What are the urgent > fixes for 2.2.1 that one would not want to have in 2.2.0? A > 2.2.2-staging branch would make more sense to me.
Yes, I agree, but for some reason didn't create it. I'll resend the message. Richard
