Guillaume Munch wrote:
> The schedule could be decided in advance, and be on the website for 
> clarity.

This is more or less decision of release manager and his style. Some
releases had that and some did not.

> In addition I would suggest the following: (Officially) allow new
> features that do not require a file format change into minor releases.

There was another suggestion for quite some while, which I like more.
Having major release with new features in one year, but no format changes.
Having major release with new features including format changes in two years.
Minor releases stay fix-only.

In either case we generally lack people willing to take the responsibility and
do the release management in long term, i.e. almost after any major release
there is optimism, how the next release will be much shorter. Then after year
or two we have to seek who will actually restart the release process again. So
be ready to commit yourself for some extra work if you cry for shorter release
times ;)

Pavel

Reply via email to