On 07/18/2016 11:01 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 18/07/2016 15:33, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> Le 18/07/2016 à 04:20, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>>
>>>> * "invert inset" and "activate branch" do not belong together, since
>>>> one is for the whole branch and the other is for only one inset (I
>>>> understand this is the reason for the name above). Some separators
>>>> should be changed.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>
> But both are about whether it appears in the output. Current situation
> is fine with me. Maybe also, having it one after another makes it
> clearer that "Invert Inset" is about the branch feature, whereas I agree
> that, alone, it would be too vague.
>
>>
>> I would say that ✔ should stand for "this particular inset is active".
>> Instead of ¬, which is not universally understood (my first idea was !,
>> which is not better), what about striking out the branch name?
>>
>
> I think the solution is just to spell out "not" instead of ¬, i.e
> bformat(_("not %1$s[[Branch Name]]"), branch_name);
> e.g. "✔ not Branch".
I'm not sure how "intuitive" the symbols here need to be. People may not
realize immediately what "✔ ¬Branch" means, but I would think they
would generally figure it out pretty quickly. Plus of course it can be
mentioned
in the docs. And I'm not sure "not Branch" is any clearer.
Richard
