On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:16:10PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 06/09/2016 à 07:55, racoon a écrit : > > On 04.09.2016 00:18, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > Le 29/08/2016 à 11:33, racoon a écrit : > > > > On Reverse search LyX puts the cursor at a position only *close* to but > > > > not exactly at the position chosen in the pdf document. It is a bit > > > > tricky for me to always find the former position in my document. Since > > > > it is anyway not the exact position maybe it is possible to select the > > > > whole line(s) rather than a close position? > > > > > > > > > > This is quite easy to do. It would select text up to the next recorded > > > entry, as is done during error reporting. Any objection? > > > > Not sure you are asking me in particular or people in general. > > Just asking other people if they dislike the idea.
If I understand correctly, I like the idea. > > But I > > don't understand what "text up to the next recorded entry" is. > > I meant that it would select up to the position recorded for the subsequent > latex line. I think racoon might have interpreted it as "select from where the cursor used to be up to where the new cursor position is", but I think you are pointing out that we cannot know exactly which line to highlight because the reverse text is with respect ot the LaTeX line, which does not map 1-to-1 with the LyX lines. I will be happy to test if you work on this. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
