On 2016-09-13, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-13, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>> >> * Do you still need the "suspendeTests"? What for?
>>> > Yes, we need them. This tests will not be executed with the call 'ctest
>>> > -L export'.
>>> In the meantime, we know the particular problem for most of the suspended
>>> Some were fixed. Others require inversion (we know the problem is a
>>> wontfix or a bug on trac).
Therefore, I'll reword the question:
Do you call `ctest -L export` regularely?
Could you imagine calling `ctest -L export -LE "texissues|attic"` instead?
-1 more to type
+1 filters not only 58 but 80 "wontfix" inverted tests
+4 makes the test system less complicated.
Do you call `ctest -L inverted` regularely?
Could you imagine calling `ctest -L inverted -LE "texissues|attic"` instead?
>> My understanding is that they are suspended because of difficult to
>> solve, therefore we do not try to tests them every time.
However, the "usual full run" (without -L) does test them.
How often is -L used without also -R to select specific tests via regexp?