Am Freitag, 16. September 2016 um 19:28:04, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2016-09-13, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-09-13, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >>> >> * Do you still need the "suspendeTests"? What for? > > >>> > Yes, we need them. This tests will not be executed with the call 'ctest > >>> > -L export'. > > ... > > >>> In the meantime, we know the particular problem for most of the suspended > >>> tests. > >>> Some were fixed. Others require inversion (we know the problem is a > >>> wontfix or a bug on trac). > > Therefore, I'll reword the question: > > Do you call `ctest -L export` regularely?
This is my alias for export: ctest -j12 -timeout 300 -L export -E "xhtml|lyx16|lyx21|lyx22" > Could you imagine calling `ctest -L export -LE "texissues|attic"` instead? Sure, but if you think texissues should not be tested, make them part of suspended. > -1 more to type > > +1 filters not only 58 but 80 "wontfix" inverted tests > > +4 makes the test system less complicated. > > Do you call `ctest -L inverted` regularely? Sometimes, yes. > Could you imagine calling `ctest -L inverted -LE "texissues|attic"` instead? > > ... > > >> My understanding is that they are suspended because of difficult to > >> solve, therefore we do not try to tests them every time. > > However, the "usual full run" (without -L) does test them. Sure, I never claimed otherwise. > How often is -L used without also -R to select specific tests via regexp? Here? Almost always. That was one reason to invent/use labels. > Günter Kornel
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.