On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:28:48AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:

> > But at the same time I don't think it makes sense to deviate from the
> > original (English) version, where ERT is used. 
> Yes.
> > So I think you are right that is the way to go, unless we want to
> > change all versions of the Beamer manual to a comment or note inset,
> > and that seems like more work than should be done for this trivial
> > issue.
> Yes.
> -> invert the test (pdf4_texF)
> > Changed to \'{e} in stable at 9f3518bc and cherry-picked to master at
> > 1c7835c0.
> > Thanks for the discussion. I now have a better idea of how to deal with
> > this for similar issues when they come up.
> I don't think this is the right way.
> The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic
> tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to read.

I agree this is the right policy. If I convert those comments to a LyX
note or comment inset, this policy is still satisfied because the inset
is just as readable, right? So either:

(1) revert the commit I pushed and invert the test


(2) change the inset for all beamer manuals.

Do you agree that both would be satisfactory?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to