On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:51:36PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 20. September 2016 um 10:56:29, schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
> <skost...@lyx.org>
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:28:48AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:

> > > The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic
> > > tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to 
> > > read.
> > 
> > I agree this is the right policy. If I convert those comments to a LyX
> > note or comment inset, this policy is still satisfied because the inset
> > is just as readable, right? So either:
> > 
> > (1) revert the commit I pushed and invert the test
> 
> Please no. If we never interpret ERT, then this will stay inverted forever.
> Inverted tests are waiting for correction, at least this was what I have/had 
> in mind.

I tend to agree. Something feels wrong with inverting. Unless we label
the issue as a LyX enhancement (and create a trac ticket) because there
is no way in LyX to produce LyX-readable content in this case that can
be exported to several different formats.

> > or
> > 
> > (2) change the inset for all beamer manuals.
> 
> +1

OK I will go for this. I'll wait another day or so to see if G√ľnter
disagrees.

Scott

> > Do you agree that both would be satisfactory?
> > 
> > Scott
> 
>       Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to