On 2016-10-09, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:33:42PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote:
> I see what you mean now. I think we both would agree with the following: > "if by using ERT that works with pdflatex, xelatex, and luatex we > achieve the same level of clarity in the document, then that should be > preferred over ERT that works for only pdflatex. Otherwise (if we cannot > achieve the same level of clarity), the clarity of the document is most > important and thus the ERT that works only with pdflatex should be > preferred." Yes, this is the detailed version of the comment in invertedTests: Sublabel: ert # # Export failures due to "raw" LaTeX use in ERT or preamble code. # "Wontfix" if demonstrating correct use and OK in the default output format. (However, IMO this description is too elaborated to be written down in the documentation.) Günter
