Jürgen, sorry to have missed your question.
Actually, I simply hesitated to include ujclasses because, judging from the
circulating information on web, upLaTeX seems a room for a change and
wondered if it is good thing to add another line in the long dropdown list
of document classes.
Supporting ujclass is simple -- simply I can copy jarticle layout file
modifying the first line.
Shall I do so? If there is no problem in supporting it, supporting broader
classes would be better.
Koji
2017-09-07 19:14 GMT+09:00 LyX Ticket Tracker <t...@lyx.org>:
> #10746: Incorporating new Japanese layouts (BX Class)
> -------------------------+----------------------------
> Reporter: yokota | Owner: rgheck
> Type: enhancement | Status: fixedinmaster
> Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.3.0
> Component: layout | Version: 2.3.0dev
> Severity: normal | Resolution:
> Keywords: |
> -------------------------+----------------------------
>
> Comment (by spitz):
>
> BTW is there a reason why we don't support {{{upLaTeX}}} and the
> {{{ujclasses}}}?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10746#comment:5>
> The LyX Project <http://www.lyx.org/>
> LyX -- The Document Processor
>
