On 10/15/2017 12:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 04:17:21PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote:
>> commit de2a58d986739bccb83615e8515d715ebf1b5821
>> Author: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>
>> Date:   Thu Jun 30 14:53:19 2016 -0400
>>
>>     Fix bug #8782.
>>     
>>     We need to invalidate the BibTeX cache when undoing or redoing. I do
>>     not like having to do it for every undo or redo. We should only have
>>     to do it if we restored or deleted an InsetBibTeX. But there is no
>>     way, so far as I can see, to do it that way. I tried.
>>     
>>     (cherry picked from commit 02847641a8b97a57d1866120bb446427e0bda7a4)
>> ---
> This is the commit that bisect lead me to when experiencing a very
> slight delay after an undo [1]. The delay is very small for me, but we
> are not sure whether this commit is also why racoon experiences a
> one-second delay. Perhaps this issue is important enough that we would
> accept a one-second delay. I just wanted to mention this though.
>
> I will CC Uwe on the main thread [1]. Hopefully he can reproduce the
> issue racoon sees so we can figure out the root problem.

Oh, yes! Sorry, I missed that other message. This would do it, and it is
exactly the kind of change
I was thinking might cause this. It does force a re-read of the BibTeX
files, so how long a delay you
see will depend upon how big the files are, etc.

Richard

Reply via email to