On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:07:29PM +0000, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 07/05/2017 à 21:58, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
>
> >
> > What do you think? Should I parse the files to find \usepackage{xxx}
> > command in preambles, where xxx is one of the ten math packages managed
> > by math options
>
> I did not find any occurrence.
>
> > or is it sufficient to have no ctest failure?
> >
>
> I reran the test procedure of these changes in math options on recent master
> and documented it precisely in ticket #10661. The changes seem safe to me,
> and below is the beginning of a commit appropriate to perform them. Can it
> go to master ?
> It is also candidate to 2.3.x (and maybe to 2.2.x too).Thanks for your work on this, Jean-Pierre, and for your detailed notes on the ticket. Do you have a full patch for the 2.3.x branch? If you do not want to send a large file to the list, you can send it to me privately. That way I can run the ctests just to double-check. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
