On 09/02/2018 10:50 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> In longer-term -- if this ban continues -- we might try to ask Qt to do the >> conversions instead of imagemagick, but that's is definitely not for 2.3.1. > That might be a good backup to get working well even if it weren't for > this issue. We should do a lot of testing.
I'm certain I do not know enough about this part of the code to do this, but anything we can have Qt do for us here seems like the right thing to do. Then again, Ghostscript seems to be embedded in everything. Maybe Qt uses it. Riki
